I virtually never wear dresses anymore, not even to church because ours is very casual.
I feel like I did my time; I wore a dress or a skirt every Sunday (a.m and p.m) and Wednesday night when I was growing up. My mom had strong ideas about what it meant to be the preacher's family.
But we are driving to Canada next week for my brother's wedding, and I needed something to wear, so I hit Kohl's. I'm not easy to fit because I'm very petite, so I was quite happy when I found two possibilities, and they were under $20 each!
I'm going to return one of them, since they are similar in color and I really don't need two.
You can help me decide which one to keep!
Things you need to know:
I cannot wear anything remotely resembling a heel
Yes, this is as "tan" as I will ever be
My nine year old took the photos, so...
Option 1
Option 2
(it's hard to tell in this photo, but it also has turquoise in it)
Honestly, these pictures pretty much confirmed my suspicion that Opt. 1 looks better, but I'd still be interested in your opinions. The only thing I don't like about #1 is that more of my very white and somewhat spider-veiny legs show.
Now, about the shoes. With the first dress I'm wearing black peep-toes that I think might look too much like slippers. With the second dress I'm wearing a black patent ballet flat.
As I mentioned, heels are out, but I might possibly be able to swing a low wedge. Target had a couple of options online; whether or not I'd be able to find them in my size in the store is another thing.
I also thought these were cute, but I'm not sure if they're wedding appropriate.
So, which dress?
And what is your opinion about the shoes? Is a low wedge any better than a flat? Do you like either of the above wedges? Is the turquoise flip-flop too casual?
Or should I just stay with my black flats, and if so which ones?